The textile industry is the world’s oldest branch of consumer goods manufacturing. It is a diverse and heterogeneous sector which covers the entire production chain of transforming natural and chemical fibres (such as cotton, wool, and oil) into end-user goods, including garments, household goods, and industrial textiles. In terms of intensity of trade, textile and clothing is the world’s second-biggest economic activity ($353 billion in 2001)1 and account for 7% of world exports. The textile and clothing sector accounts for 3% of total manufacturing value added in Europe. Textiles are heavily intertwined with environmental, social and governance issues. In the past, efforts of producers and retailers have primarily focused on improving the social aspects of textiles e.g. establishing fair working conditions, setting social standards, establishing minumum wages, ensuring occupational safety, imposing a ban on child and forced labour, etc. Over the years, however, there has been growing concern about the environmental impacts of textiles. According to the EIPRO study, clothing alone is responsible for 2 to 10 % of the EU’s lifecycle environmental impacts. This results in textiles coming fourth in the ranking of product category which cause the greatest environmental impact, just after food & drinks, transport and housing. The precise environmental impact of textiles varies significantly depending on the type of fibre the garment is made from. However, generally speaking they include:
· energy use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, nutrients releases (leading to eutrophication) and ecotoxicity from washing (water heating and detergents) and dying of textiles;
· energy use, resource depletion and GHG emissions from processing fossil fuels into synthetic fibres, e.g. polyester or nylon;
· significant water use, toxicity from fertiliser, pesticide and herbicide use, energy use and GHG emissions associated with fertiliser generation and irrigation systems related to production of fibre crops, e.g. cotton;
· water use , toxicity, hazardous waste and effluent associated with the production stage, including pre-treatment chemicals, dyes and finishes.

All actors along the supply chain have a role to play in reducing the environmental footprint of textile products. First of all producers, because as explained above, considerable impacts might be generated during the fibre production, dying, printing and finishing; but also consumers as considerable environmental impacts occur during the use phase. For example, most of the energy used in the life-cycle of a cotton T-shirt is related to post-purchasing washing and drying at high temperatures. It is also estimated that consumers, in the UK throw away as much as 1 million tonnes of textiles every year. Against this background, many voluntary initiatives to reduce the environmental footprint of textiles, especially for cotton and polyester, have been developed or are in the pipeline. The uptake by retailers of the various initiatives in this domaine are high. The “march” towards more sustainable textiles is well underway.

Although the definition of “sustainable textiles” is still open to debate, and considering the relatively high impact that textiles have on the environment during their life-cycle, “environmentally friendlier” textiles will be defined as textiles which minimise negative life-cycle environmental impacts along the supply chain, including production and consumer behaviour (care and disposal of clothing).

Most textiles specific EU legislation addresses the issues of imports from low-wage countries, sets standards for textile names or sets standards for the chemical analysis of textile fibres. From an environmental perspective, the most relevant pieces of legislation are chemical related: the most important being REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances) (Regulation (EC) No 1907/20069 ). For textiles produced in Europe, substances incorporated in the textiles, need to be registered. For imported (outside of the EU) textiles, importers need to notify ECHA if the textiles they import contain SVHC (substances of very high concern) in concentration above 0,1% (w/w) if the total annual volume in all products imported is greater than 1 tonne. Consumers also have the possibility to ask retailers if products contain SVHC in a concentration above 0,1%. Other pieces of legislation include the recently adopted Biocides Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 528/2012), which establishes the regulatory framework for the making available on the market and use of biocidal products. Unlike REACH and the Biocides Regulation, the Waste Framework Directive (Directive 2008/98/EC) specificially refers to textiles. Besides defining the waste hierarchy i.e. prevention, preparation for reuse, recycling, energy recovery and disposal, the directive also calls for end of waste specific criteria for textiles to be developed. For textiles, a number of different voluntary environmental labelling schemes exist on the market. They include the ISO 14024 “Type I” EU Eco-label, the Nordic Swan and the Blue Angel . Other standards address environmental and social criteria along the supply chain e.g. Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS). Under the EU Eco-label, criteria have been developed for textiles (Commission Decision 2009/567/EC, currently under revision), textile floor coverings (Commission Decision 2009/967/EC), footwear (Commission Decision 2009/563/EC) and criteria for bed mattresses (Commission Decision 2009/598/EC) . Other public and private initaitives establishing environmental and social standards have also been set up and taken up both by producers and retailers. A business-led initiative of relevance is currently being developed by the Sustainable Apparel Coalition (SAC). One of the objectives of this initiative is the development of the Higg Index, an indicator based tool for apparel that enables companies to evaluate material types, products, facilities and processes based on a range of environmental and product design choices. To check compliance with fair working conditions in line with the ILO norms a broad range of social standard schemes were developed by retailers and producers. The most common are summarised under the umbrella of the Global Social Compliance Programme.

Currently, it is the producers and retailers who are mostly driving the improvements in sustainability of textiles and are also working at raising consumer awareness. There is growing attention towards not only social, but also environmental impacts of textiles; especially for specific kind of products such as childrenswear, demand for more environmentally friendlier textiles is continuously increasing. Permanent and quick changes in fashion can be an opportunity for rapid uptake of sustainable garments, but also a barrier since such trends could quickly be replaced by something else. In other areas like interior or underwear innovation cycles are much slower.

· By improving their environmental and social performances, brands can improve their reputation;
· Linking business to social and environmental projects enables companies to build a strong connection with consumers by involving them in sustainability initiatives;
· Technological innovation in production processes, along the supply chain which contribute to improve the environmental footprint of processes and which may save costs, enabling the use of more recycled materials i.e. end of life polyester can be recycled into new clothes;
· There are already well established environmental labels that producers can apply for to prove their superior environmental performances (such as the EU Ecolabel, Blue Angel, Nordic Swan, GOTS).

· Complex and global value chains often with low traceability represent an obstacle for producers and brands who want to improve their production patterns;
· Socially and environmentally friendlier textiles might result in more expensive finished products;
· The perception of some consumers that sustainable garments are not stylish or fashionable, and that the design and the appearance of eco-clothing is unfashionable and unattractive;
· An insufficient consumer demand. Producers and retailers who want to promote more environmentally friendlier textiles need to develop the market;
· The market for recycled garments and fibres is still weak due to insufficient take-back systems and absence of convenient and reputable drop-off locations for unwanted clothing/textiles in many countries, which results in perfectly useable garments sent to landfill or incinerated;
· Low knowledge level about strategic sustainability among fashion and textile companies and their suppliers and lack of resources to upgrade and integrate new knowledge and new technologies, especially in small and medium sized enterprises;
· There are many labels on the market which can lead to consumer confusion.

Developing production processes using lower amounts of water, pesticides, insecticides, hazardous chemicals or lower releases of GHG etc. is as important as the measures adopted by retailers and consumers to select such textiles. However, consumer behaviour in how they care for and dispose of clothing and other textile products is of equal importance, e.g. selecting the appropriate washing temperatures, taking the right steps to significantly extend the lifetimes and encouraging recycling of garments once they have reached their end of life. These important issues are all areas where retailers can have a high degree of influence .

Key challenges
· Continuing to improve the working and social conditions of workers outside the EU, while offering textiles at an affordable price for EU consumers whose purchasing power is declining;
· Improving the overall environmental footprint of textiles over their entire life-cycle and supply chain;
· Changing consumer attitudes of buying as cheap as possible and as many as possible;
· Providing consumers with relevant information concerning the environmental footprint of the textile products, based on harmonised systems at least at European level.

What can retailers do?
· Offer and promote more environmentally friendlier textiles;
· Demand more environmental and social accountability from producers;Communicate to consumers the added value of sustainability and inform them on more environmentally friendly behaviour e.g. encouraging the most efficient wash cycle programmes, lower temperatures etc. and how this can help them save money on energy bills and reduce water usage thus lowering overall environmental footprint;
· Encourage recycling of garments, promoting locally provided clothes banks/bins, etc.;
· For retailers who provide employees with working clothes, revert to more socially and environmentally friendlier textiles;
· Include sustainability issue in staff training.

What can producers do?
· Source their suppliers based on their social and environmental performances;
· Use best practices in technological innovation which contribute to improve the environmental footprint of processes;
· Substitute hazardous substances with safer substances;
· Increase information exchange with retailers, provide them with information about the latest innovative solutions that help them address their sustainability challenges/objectives;
· Support the development of Product Category Rules for textiles according to a methodology at least harmonised at European level and use it as a basis for communicating the environmental performance of their products both in B2B and B2C;
· Develop and offer more environmentally friendlier textiles;
· Promote the use of more sustainable fibres like organic cotton, recycled fibres, etc.;
· Engage in research about new fibres and materials with lower environmental impacts compared to natural fibres;
· Improve care labels on products, and together with retailers increase focus on consumer communication to promote responsible care;
· Encourage the reuse/recycling of old clothes and textiles to produce new clothes, rather than using raw materials, promote remanufacturing and fashion upgrades;
· Communicate to consumers their sustainability efforts;
· Demand their suppliers to implement international social standards e.g. ILO standards.

What can policy makers do?
Encourage initiatives, project innovation etc. and provide incentives for the development and take-up of environmentally friendlier textiles;
· Lead by example by purchasing environmentally friendlier textiles following the GPP criteria developed at European level 
· Support the inclusion of social criteria in the existing EU Ecolabel and take an active role in its on-going revision and GPP criteria developed at European level;
· Encourage the implementation of ILO norms;
· Support, implement and/or fund consumer awareness and behaviour change campaigns;
· Support industry and Member States in the development of Product Category Rules on textiles based on a harmonised methodology;
· Examine the use of economic instruments for promoting sustainable consumption of textiles/clothing;
· Develop measures for better tackling “greenwashing” i.e. false sustainability claims;
· Governments should revisit the approach and effectiveness of policy related to chemical use in the fashion and textile industry, including chemicals used in the fibre or garment production processes, no matter if they take place in the European Union or not. In addition, new technologies, such as nanotechnology and GMOs, should be thoroughly investigated to determine whether and to what extent they pose a risk to human health and the environment.

What can we do together?
· Launch and further promote collaborative initiatives to improve the environmental performance of textiles across the supply chain (sustainable design, fibres and fabrics, maximise reuse/recycling/end-of-life-management, sustainable cleaning);
· Start awareness raising campaigns and sharing of experiences in textile processing regions;
· Manufacturers (clothing, white goods, detergents, etc.), retailers, consumer groups, etc. should carry out campaigns and inform consumers on issues of common interest related to sustainable fashion consumption and work with designers, celebrities and NGOs to help spread the messages on how to be more environmentally friendly, e.g. reducing the temperatures of the wash cycle, etc.